前言：
当一个人的观念为他人接受时称为暗示；当一个人的情绪为他人感受时称为同情；当一个人的行动为他人效仿时称为模仿。当然，在现实生活中，无论是思想、感情还是行动都可以产生暗示。在通常情况下，暗示者是主动的、自觉的，而受暗示者则常常是被动的。
我们知道，图像的功能是隐蔽的。在我们与画面的对峙中，我们既是看者，又暗自能察觉到自己是被看者，但图像极大地改变并且模糊了看与被看的关系，它解除了人们的戒心，相应地产生了意识形态已经终结的幻觉。这种看与被看意识上的倒置，同时也来自于“消费”的支持。如果说，80年代中期的“美术新潮运动”是一种对当时的现实生活无奈的接受和认同，那么，近年来的相当一部分作品却是另一种接受和认同。正是权力的不在场，使我们产生了意识形态已经终结的幻象或者幻觉。近年来的绘画鲜见深入对形式的探索和实验。在某种意义上也可以说是我们和现实建立了过于“甜蜜”的关系。正是在这种甜蜜的关系中，我们渐渐放弃了对现实的进一步追问，从而满足于对事物表象的叙述。尖锐的思想和批判性的丧失，也导致了我们丧失提出问题的能力。
“暗示者”是一个非常开放的话题，它蕴含着许多可以延伸并加以讨论的分散话题，其指涉面可以是非常广泛的。如果我们把绘画理解为一种“叙述”，那么在任何一种叙述背后，都隐藏着观念。叙述依托观念组织各种材料，并结构成作品，从而产生意义。只是有的明显，有的深藏不露而已。因此，形式的冲突，常常意味着观念的冲突。绝对终极的真理并不存在，叙事的再现只是率领我们不断向真理逼近。
让我们先从“绘画”这一问题上暂时撤离，经由另一路径进入我们一直讨论的话题。当观念走向极端，尤其是形成了所谓“内部、外部”两个截然对立时，人与其存在语境的所有联系无形中也就被自然切断了。这时候，善与恶的伦理观，在此顽强地阻挡着人对存在的进一步追问。而所谓的“内心叙事”，也开始演化为一种自恋式的倾诉。
而对于“暗示者”来说，个体的复杂性或者说丰富性不再被共通的描绘或者对内心的叙述上。个人不再成为某种知识观念控制下形成的常态，而是开放的、运动的观念与其现实存在的各种意识形态的联系被再次有机的恢复。正是在这种联系中，人的复杂性或者丰富性才可能呈现或者再现。
我们所处的这个世界，已经越来越被专业化的分工割裂成无数个“碎片”。当宏大叙事被个体的经验所取代的时候，“暗示者”却往往有一种重组日常的愿望。很难说这是一种宏大叙事，但却是一种艰难的再现的努力。
此次展览以“暗示者”为主题，邀请以绘画为主要艺术手段的“暗示者”—— 王亚彬、徐弘、朱存伟、曾扬、葛震、魏言，他们分别来自于北京、河南、南京、四川等地，在各自的绘画领域都有深入的探索。中国当代艺术发展到今天，从最初简单复制的拿来主义，用30年时间走西方300年发展之路的野蛮生长，到同时面临着本体文化语言形态与西方美学体系的融合、互生。“暗示者”作为这个时代的“另类绘本”，会给我们这个时代提供什么样的启迪或者可能呢？
“暗示者”群展就是在这样的背景下展开，形式上的探索和实验，哪怕再过于极端，它也预示着有一种力量将再度风生水起。展览将于2011年6月4日在上海市莫干山路95号银石空间隆重开幕，本展览将持续到7月1日。、
Preface:
When a people's ideas for others to accept called hinted; When a person's mood for others to feel when called sympathy; When a person's action for others to emulate called imitate. Of course, in real life, whether thoughts, feelings or action can produce a hint. Normally, suggests that is active, conscious, and be suggests that often is passive.
We know, image function is hidden. In our confrontation with pictures, since we see an and inwardly could detect he was watching, but the images greatly change and blur to see and be seen relationships, it lifted a wary of people, and correspondingly produce ideologies have the end of illusion. This to see and be seen consciousness of the inverted, also from "consumption" support. If, in the mid 1980s "art trendy sports" is a time for real life helplessly accept and agree with, then, in recent years a substantial part of their work is another kind of accepting and identity. It is not present, make the power we produce ideologies have the end of illusion or illusion. In recent years to form the painting of huankantou in-depth exploration and experiment. In a sense, also can saying is we and realistic established too "sweet" relationship. It is in this sweet relationship, we gradually abandoned further inquiry of reality, thus satisfied with the narrative of representation. Sharp's thoughts and critical loss, also led to the loss of the ability of our questions.
"Who Suggested" is a very open topic, it contains the many can be extended, and discussion of the subject, the scattered that reference plane can be very extensive. If we put the painting for a kind of understanding, then "narrative" in any kind of narrative, hidden behind concept. Relying on the idea to organize all kinds of narrative material, and structure into works, resulting in meaning. But some obvious, some hidden depths just. Therefore, forms of conflict, usually means that ideas of the conflict. Absolutely the ultimate truth does not exist, narrative reappear just led us to keep the truth approximation.
Let us begin from "painting" on this issue via another temporarily to evacuate, we have been path entering the topic of discussion. When ideas to an extreme, especially formed a so-called "internal and external" two completely opposite to its existence, people all the contact virtually context was natural cut off. At that time, ethics, of good and evil in the tenacious blocking people further inquiry of existence. The so-called "inner narrative", also began to evolve to a narcissistic type pleading.
For "Who Suggested" the complexity of the individual is no longer be common or richness to the inner narrative depicting or. Individual is no longer a certain knowledge concept formed under the control norm, but open, sports concept of its existence by the ideology of organic recovery contact again. It is in this kind of connection, the person's complexity or richness just may present or reproduction.
We are in the world, already more and more is professional division into innumerable "separate pieces". When grand narrative replaced by the individual experience, "Who Suggested" but often have a restructuring daily desire. Hard to say this is a grand narrative, but it is a difficult recreate the effort.
This exhibition with "Who Suggested" as the theme, invited to painting as the main art means "Who Suggested" – Wang Yabin, Xu Hong, Zhu Cunwei, Ceng Yang, Ge Zhen, Wei Yan, they from Beijing, Henan, Nanjing, Sichuan, etc, in their respective painting domain has further exploration. Chinese contemporary art from the initial development today, a simple copy of copycat, with 30 years’ time to walk the road of development of western 300 years of savage growth, but it is facing ontology culture form of language and western aesthetics system integration, alternate. "Who Suggested" as the era of "alternative draw this", will give us this era what kind of enlightenment or may provide?
"Who Suggested" group exhibition is launched in this context, to explore and experiment in form, even then too extreme, it also indicates that there is a force to re-wind and water. The exhibition will be June 4, 2011, No. 95 Moganshan Road in the Silverstone grand opening of space, the exhibition will last until July 1.
如果您需要更多关于此次展览的信息，请联系我们。
For more information on the coming exhibition, please feel free to contact us.
Cel: +86-021-32201055
Email:hi@20zo.com
Add：中国上海市莫干山路95号银石空间 (20060)
White Stone Space, No.95, Moganshan Road, Shanghai, China
当一个人的观念为他人接受时称为暗示；当一个人的情绪为他人感受时称为同情；当一个人的行动为他人效仿时称为模仿。当然，在现实生活中，无论是思想、感情还是行动都可以产生暗示。在通常情况下，暗示者是主动的、自觉的，而受暗示者则常常是被动的。
我们知道，图像的功能是隐蔽的。在我们与画面的对峙中，我们既是看者，又暗自能察觉到自己是被看者，但图像极大地改变并且模糊了看与被看的关系，它解除了人们的戒心，相应地产生了意识形态已经终结的幻觉。这种看与被看意识上的倒置，同时也来自于“消费”的支持。如果说，80年代中期的“美术新潮运动”是一种对当时的现实生活无奈的接受和认同，那么，近年来的相当一部分作品却是另一种接受和认同。正是权力的不在场，使我们产生了意识形态已经终结的幻象或者幻觉。近年来的绘画鲜见深入对形式的探索和实验。在某种意义上也可以说是我们和现实建立了过于“甜蜜”的关系。正是在这种甜蜜的关系中，我们渐渐放弃了对现实的进一步追问，从而满足于对事物表象的叙述。尖锐的思想和批判性的丧失，也导致了我们丧失提出问题的能力。
“暗示者”是一个非常开放的话题，它蕴含着许多可以延伸并加以讨论的分散话题，其指涉面可以是非常广泛的。如果我们把绘画理解为一种“叙述”，那么在任何一种叙述背后，都隐藏着观念。叙述依托观念组织各种材料，并结构成作品，从而产生意义。只是有的明显，有的深藏不露而已。因此，形式的冲突，常常意味着观念的冲突。绝对终极的真理并不存在，叙事的再现只是率领我们不断向真理逼近。
让我们先从“绘画”这一问题上暂时撤离，经由另一路径进入我们一直讨论的话题。当观念走向极端，尤其是形成了所谓“内部、外部”两个截然对立时，人与其存在语境的所有联系无形中也就被自然切断了。这时候，善与恶的伦理观，在此顽强地阻挡着人对存在的进一步追问。而所谓的“内心叙事”，也开始演化为一种自恋式的倾诉。
而对于“暗示者”来说，个体的复杂性或者说丰富性不再被共通的描绘或者对内心的叙述上。个人不再成为某种知识观念控制下形成的常态，而是开放的、运动的观念与其现实存在的各种意识形态的联系被再次有机的恢复。正是在这种联系中，人的复杂性或者丰富性才可能呈现或者再现。
我们所处的这个世界，已经越来越被专业化的分工割裂成无数个“碎片”。当宏大叙事被个体的经验所取代的时候，“暗示者”却往往有一种重组日常的愿望。很难说这是一种宏大叙事，但却是一种艰难的再现的努力。
此次展览以“暗示者”为主题，邀请以绘画为主要艺术手段的“暗示者”—— 王亚彬、徐弘、朱存伟、曾扬、葛震、魏言，他们分别来自于北京、河南、南京、四川等地，在各自的绘画领域都有深入的探索。中国当代艺术发展到今天，从最初简单复制的拿来主义，用30年时间走西方300年发展之路的野蛮生长，到同时面临着本体文化语言形态与西方美学体系的融合、互生。“暗示者”作为这个时代的“另类绘本”，会给我们这个时代提供什么样的启迪或者可能呢？
“暗示者”群展就是在这样的背景下展开，形式上的探索和实验，哪怕再过于极端，它也预示着有一种力量将再度风生水起。展览将于2011年6月4日在上海市莫干山路95号银石空间隆重开幕，本展览将持续到7月1日。、
Preface:
When a people's ideas for others to accept called hinted; When a person's mood for others to feel when called sympathy; When a person's action for others to emulate called imitate. Of course, in real life, whether thoughts, feelings or action can produce a hint. Normally, suggests that is active, conscious, and be suggests that often is passive.
We know, image function is hidden. In our confrontation with pictures, since we see an and inwardly could detect he was watching, but the images greatly change and blur to see and be seen relationships, it lifted a wary of people, and correspondingly produce ideologies have the end of illusion. This to see and be seen consciousness of the inverted, also from "consumption" support. If, in the mid 1980s "art trendy sports" is a time for real life helplessly accept and agree with, then, in recent years a substantial part of their work is another kind of accepting and identity. It is not present, make the power we produce ideologies have the end of illusion or illusion. In recent years to form the painting of huankantou in-depth exploration and experiment. In a sense, also can saying is we and realistic established too "sweet" relationship. It is in this sweet relationship, we gradually abandoned further inquiry of reality, thus satisfied with the narrative of representation. Sharp's thoughts and critical loss, also led to the loss of the ability of our questions.
"Who Suggested" is a very open topic, it contains the many can be extended, and discussion of the subject, the scattered that reference plane can be very extensive. If we put the painting for a kind of understanding, then "narrative" in any kind of narrative, hidden behind concept. Relying on the idea to organize all kinds of narrative material, and structure into works, resulting in meaning. But some obvious, some hidden depths just. Therefore, forms of conflict, usually means that ideas of the conflict. Absolutely the ultimate truth does not exist, narrative reappear just led us to keep the truth approximation.
Let us begin from "painting" on this issue via another temporarily to evacuate, we have been path entering the topic of discussion. When ideas to an extreme, especially formed a so-called "internal and external" two completely opposite to its existence, people all the contact virtually context was natural cut off. At that time, ethics, of good and evil in the tenacious blocking people further inquiry of existence. The so-called "inner narrative", also began to evolve to a narcissistic type pleading.
For "Who Suggested" the complexity of the individual is no longer be common or richness to the inner narrative depicting or. Individual is no longer a certain knowledge concept formed under the control norm, but open, sports concept of its existence by the ideology of organic recovery contact again. It is in this kind of connection, the person's complexity or richness just may present or reproduction.
We are in the world, already more and more is professional division into innumerable "separate pieces". When grand narrative replaced by the individual experience, "Who Suggested" but often have a restructuring daily desire. Hard to say this is a grand narrative, but it is a difficult recreate the effort.
This exhibition with "Who Suggested" as the theme, invited to painting as the main art means "Who Suggested" – Wang Yabin, Xu Hong, Zhu Cunwei, Ceng Yang, Ge Zhen, Wei Yan, they from Beijing, Henan, Nanjing, Sichuan, etc, in their respective painting domain has further exploration. Chinese contemporary art from the initial development today, a simple copy of copycat, with 30 years’ time to walk the road of development of western 300 years of savage growth, but it is facing ontology culture form of language and western aesthetics system integration, alternate. "Who Suggested" as the era of "alternative draw this", will give us this era what kind of enlightenment or may provide?
"Who Suggested" group exhibition is launched in this context, to explore and experiment in form, even then too extreme, it also indicates that there is a force to re-wind and water. The exhibition will be June 4, 2011, No. 95 Moganshan Road in the Silverstone grand opening of space, the exhibition will last until July 1.
如果您需要更多关于此次展览的信息，请联系我们。
For more information on the coming exhibition, please feel free to contact us.
Cel: +86-021-32201055
Email:hi@20zo.com
Add：中国上海市莫干山路95号银石空间 (20060)
White Stone Space, No.95, Moganshan Road, Shanghai, China
